Last month marked the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's famous "A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand" speech made during his acceptance of the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate from the state of Illinois. (Blessedly, he lost the election.) Toward the end of his oratory, Lincoln summed up the complexion of the Republican party, as constituted in 1858, as being made up of "strange, discordant, and even hostile elements."
Lincoln's evergreen assessment of the GOP was cited in another speech, made just over a century later by Barry Goldwater, who was accepting his party's nomination for president before the Republican national convention. During his address, a minute or so after quoting Lincoln, Goldwater delivered one of the scariest statements ever uttered by a nominated candidate for the presidency. Today, July 16, is the 44th anniversary of those still shocking words: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice..." Listen (mp3). [To read or hear the entire speech, go here.] The terrifying threat at the heart of Goldwater's declaration was nuked less than two months later by Lyndon Johnson's crack advertising team. See the video atop my blog post last month. In an odd coincidence, today also just happens to be the 63rd anniversary of the first successful A-Bomb test, near Los Alamos, New Mexico.
(For an example of fascistic blather from a more recent presidential candidate, look no further than Rudolph Giuliani. Three months into his first term as New York's mayor, he made this statement: "Freedom is about authority. Freedom is about the willingness of every single human being to cede to lawful authority a great deal of discretion about what you do and how you do it.")
Thanks..
Posted by: mırc | July 16, 2008 at 12:44 PM
"Freedom is about authority." Er, ya, 4 legs good, or something. No, freedom is not about authority, you idiot, freedom is about proscribing the limits of authority. If you don't get that, basically, you are shitting on the American Revolution.
Posted by: JT | July 17, 2008 at 12:08 AM
Oh no, freedom scares me! Barry Goldwater may not have been the ideal presidential candidate (most aren't), but he took a principled stand for freedom and limited government. American voters chose Johnson, and got what they deserved: four more years of the welfare-warfare state, inflation, debt and civil unrest - and a series of presidential candidates that offer us only a choice between big government and bigger government.
Posted by: Grumbledook | July 17, 2008 at 03:10 PM
I know this isn't too important, but the Trinity site is actually quite a distance from Los Alamos. Los Alamos is in the northern part of New Mexico and the Trinity site is in southern NM. It's probably at least 200 miles. Los Alamos is the lab where bomb was developed and Trinity is where they thought it safe enough to blow the thing up and not affect anybody.
Posted by: listener jeff | July 17, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Right you are Jeff. That was lazy reporting on my part. The Trinity site was part of the Alamogordo Bombing Range, about 35 miles southeast of Socorro, New Mexico.
Posted by: Doug | July 17, 2008 at 04:33 PM
The speech is truly disturbing, but what I notice just as much is how well it is written ... building logically and with (admittedly misguided) eloquence throughout.
No political speechwriter working today, at least whose work I've been witness to suffering through, could come close to touching it.
Posted by: Ed | July 17, 2008 at 05:09 PM
Many believe the person who wrote Goldwater's speech was Karl Hess. Dig this passage from Hess's page on Wikipedia:
"As a speechwriter for Barry Goldwater, Hess explored ideology and politics and attracted some public interest. He was widely considered to be the author of the infamous Goldwater line, "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice; moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue," but revealed that he had encountered it in a letter from Lincoln historian Harry Jaffa and later learned it was a paraphrase of a passage from Cicero."
Posted by: Doug | July 17, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Can anyone please explain to me what's so scary and shocking about the statement "[E]xtremism in the defense of liberty is no vice"? It neither scares nor shocks me. Goldwater was a true libertarian.
Posted by: Jim | July 18, 2008 at 01:47 AM
In a nutshell, context. For example, what's so disturbing about W. promising to deliver liberty to the Middle East? But Goldwater wasn't W., and having listened to some of the speech I'm also floored by how good a speech it is. Imagine a conservative movement where the principals have more than two brain cells to rub together and aren't rushing off to the bathroom for more action at the glory hole.
Posted by: K | July 18, 2008 at 12:40 PM
I remember Goldwater's speech. Goldwater was my first Presidential vote. I approved of his statement then and I approve of it now. Moderation is only for those who are afraid to take a position on anything. I hope you are not moderate in your love for your wife and family. There is a need for passionate commitment rather than for wimpish laissez faire "let's get alongism." This is, of course, not true with all matters, but the founding fathers of this country were extremists who said such things as "Give me liberty or give me death."
Posted by: George F Somsel | March 21, 2009 at 01:02 AM